Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerald Powell's avatar

I found this review to be important, clear and coherent. I'm a scientist, but not trained in immunology, virology or any of the health sciences. I found the underlining of terms (as opposed to footnote or reference numbers linked to footnotes, references or bibliographies) as a non-distracting way to cue the reader you've placed a source they can link to, immediately or later, for further information such as evidence-based research. Another area I'd like to highlight is your excellent use of metaphor or analogy to explain a scientific or statistical concept to readers who might not have the requisite knowledge. For example, you wrote: "Drawing conclusions from a single case report is statistically meaningless, as it represents an anecdotal observation rather than a meaningful data point from which any population-level inferences can be made - the equivalent of trying to characterize an ocean from a single drop of water." I learned a lot of foundational information about the human immune system from your piece. Thank you.

Expand full comment
John Collis's avatar

I used to work as a nurse on an acute neurology ward and then later in the emergency department. When on the neurology ward we had a patient with GBS that developed about 2 weeks after an acute gastrointestinal infection. Later in A&E a patient presented with unexplained bruising, on the off chance I asked if he’d had a gastrointestinal infection at all in the last couple of weeks, he said that he had. A blood test showed that he had thrombocytopenia, which could have been precipitated by the infection.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts